← Search

Deanna Dempsey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
39 matches · 13W–26L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history39 matches
L
2026-10-24 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kimberly Brown championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-23 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kyle Fisher championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-25 · Indy A65 6.0W IRCD Roberts · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kimberly Brown
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-28 · Indy A65 6.0W IRCD Roberts · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kyle Fisher
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-24 · Indy A55 7.0W D IRCD Roberts · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Brown
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-10 · Indy A55 7.0W D IRCD Roberts · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kyle Fisher
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-05 · Indy A55 7.0W D IRCD Roberts · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Brown
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betty Sterrett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-08 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracey Norman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Brown
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Myrick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
W
2024-08-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynda Manley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 37.5% of games
6.0
75%
3W–1L · 66.7% of games
7.0
40.9%
9W–13L · 45.4% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 31.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 74% of the time
#1 Doubles
74%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert