← Search

Megan Madia

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
151 matches · 77W–74L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history151 matches
L
2026-11-02 · Indy A40 3.5W MON IRCD Holden · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with MaryCatharine Grau
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-24 · Indy A40 3.0W IRCD Holden · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Bowling championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-23 · Indy A40 3.0W IRCD Holden · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine Goth championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-10-23 · Indy A40 3.0W IRCD Holden · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine Goth championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-15 · Indy A40 3.0W IHP Clem · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Clem
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-12 · Indy A40 3.5W MON IRCD Holden · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abigail Mills
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-30 · Indy C 5.5W IRCD Holden · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Grace Maher
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-28 · Indy A40 3.5W MON IRCD Holden · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Kempsell
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-23 · Indy C 5.5W IRCD Holden · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lisa Hoskin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-09-14 · Indy A40 3.5W MON IRCD Holden · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chenae Van Zee
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-08 · A18 3.0W GAP IRCD Holden · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzy Maher
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-25 · A18 3.0W GAP IRCD Holden · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Kempsell
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
73%
27W–10L · 61.7% of games
3.0
41.5%
27W–38L · 44.6% of games
3.5
30%
3W–7L · 44.2% of games
5.5
63%
17W–10L · 56.5% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 42.5% of games
6.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
40 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King