← Search

Sarah Bowling

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 67W–40L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history107 matches
L
2026-10-24 · Indy A40 3.0W IRCD Holden · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Madia championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-23 · Indy A40 3.0W IRCD Holden · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Trotter championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-10-23 · Indy A40 3.0W IRCD Holden · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Trotter championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-08 · Indy A40 3.0W IRCD Copeland · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kerry Pieper
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-10-01 · Indy A40 3.0W IRCD Copeland · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heidi Arnold
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-26 · Indy C 6.5W IRCD Trotter · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Stearns
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-09-09 · A18 3.5W GAP IRCD Collins · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Collins
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-08 · A18 3.0W GAP IRCD Holden · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie May
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-09-01 · A18 3.0W GAP IRCD Holden · #1 Female Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-23 · Indy A40 3.0W IRCD Holden · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Trotter championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-22 · Indy A40 3.0W IRCD Holden · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Trotter championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-21 · Indy A40 3.0W IRCD Holden · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Collins championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
60%
6W–4L · 53.7% of games
3.0
71.7%
33W–13L · 57.6% of games
3.5
53.1%
17W–15L · 48.5% of games
5.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 57.7% of games
6.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
23 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
10 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer