← Search

Madelaine Holbrook

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mccordsville, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
115 matches · 5W–110L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history115 matches
W
2026-11-01 · Indy C 7.5W IRCD Brown · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cari Carter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-10-19 · Indy C 7.5W IRCD Brown · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mandy Prenger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-10-09 · Indy CX 7.5 IRCD Lewis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jacob Lewis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-10-02 · Indy CX 7.5 IRCD Lewis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jacob Lewis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-27 · Indy C 7.5W IRCD Brown · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cari Carter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-09-20 · Indy C 8.5W IRCD Somers · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Schmidt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-08-14 · Indy X18 8.0 IRCD Curtiss · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Madelaine Jones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-07 · Indy X18 8.0 IRCD Curtiss · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Madelaine Jones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
Madelaine Jones / Kurt Ackerman
2026-07-31 · Indy X18 8.0 IRCD Curtiss · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janis Buesching mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-21 · Indy A18 4.0W LNHS Ackerman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Madelaine Jones
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · Indy A18 4.5W IRCD Somers · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Madelaine Jones
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-30 · Indy A18 4.0W LNHS Ackerman · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Madelaine Jones
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
0%
0W–35L · 34.8% of games
4.5
0%
0W–7L · 33.3% of games
7.5
7.1%
3W–39L · 42.2% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 34% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–18L · 38.1% of games
8.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
15 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams