← Search

Melanie Buchanan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
CARMEL, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
179 matches · 143W–36L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2025. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history179 matches
W
2026-10-30 · Indy CX 7.5 CRC Nelson · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Nelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-10-09 · Indy CX 7.5 CRC Nelson · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Nelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-20 · Indy C 8.5W IRCD Leonard · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michelle Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-17 · Mid Tri W CRC Lynch · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Nixon
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-16 · Mid Tri W CRC Lynch · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Koval
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-14 · Indy X18 8.0 CRC Nelson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Frohardt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · Indy A18 4.0W CRC Griffey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Baxter
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · Indy A40 4.0W CRC Hobbs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angie Bratton
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · Indy A40 4.0W CRC Hobbs · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Dudash
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-10 · Indy X18 8.0 CRC Nelson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Humphrey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-07 · Indy A18 4.0W CRC Griffey · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · Indy A18 4.0W CRC Griffey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Whalen
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-0, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
88.2%
15W–2L · 67.4% of games
3.5
100%
20W–0L · 77.6% of games
4.0
78.9%
56W–15L · 60.4% of games
6.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 64.1% of games
7.5
70.4%
19W–8L · 62.2% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.7% of games
8.0mixed
81.8%
18W–4L · 61.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
101 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
17 matches
#1 Singles
7%
12 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova