← Search

Leah Gehring

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Carmel, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 71W–58L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history129 matches
W
2026-11-01 · Indy C 7.5W IRCD Faulkenberg · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kate Li
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-10-30 · Indy CX 7.5 IRCD Curtiss · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gautam Petkar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-04 · Indy A40 4.5W IRCD Curtiss · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laura Grable
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-29 · Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Faulkenberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Grable
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-20 · Indy A40 4.5W IRCD Curtiss · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jill Davidson
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-14 · Indy X18 8.0 IRCE Holly · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Hu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-11 · Mid Tri W IRCD Faulkenberg · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karyn ODonnell
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-07 · Indy X18 8.0 IRCE Holly · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joshua McShane mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-03 · Mid Tri W IRCD Faulkenberg · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Belinda Denning
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-09 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Faulkenberg · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheri Faulkenberg
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-08 · Indy A40 4.5W IRCD Thompson · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heidi Somers
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Faulkenberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charlene Tay
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
60%
9W–6L · 57.5% of games
3.5
60%
12W–8L · 53.8% of games
4.0
61.9%
26W–16L · 54.7% of games
4.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 41.5% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 58.7% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 53.8% of games
8.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 40.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
36 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
11 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert