← Search

Andrea Burkhardt

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Noblesville, IN
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
194 matches · 110W–84L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history194 matches
W
2026-10-23 · Indy CX 9.5 IRCD Redding · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Miguel Flores mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-10-16 · Indy CX 9.5 IRCD Redding · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with David Chader mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-10-04 · Indy A40 4.5W PATC Squires · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tiffany Squires
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-10-02 · Indy CX 9.5 IRCD Redding · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with David Chader mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-09-27 · Indy A40 4.5W PATC Squires · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-30 · Mid Tri W IRCD Pruitt · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicola Frazer
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · Mid Tri W IRCD Pruitt · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicola Frazer
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-20 · Indy A18 4.5W WHS Pruitt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katelyn Conley
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Default
2026-07-14 · Indy A18 5.0W BRE Burkhardt · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Suzette Solomon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-13 · Indy A18 4.5W WHS Pruitt · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katelyn Conley
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-12 · Indy A18 5.0W BRE Burkhardt · #1 Singles · 5.0
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-07 · Indy A18 5.0W BRE Burkhardt · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Christina Fugate
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 57.6% of games
4.0
60%
3W–2L · 54.8% of games
4.5
53.6%
37W–32L · 54.3% of games
5.0
42.1%
8W–11L · 47.5% of games
8.5
40%
2W–3L · 44.6% of games
10.0mixed
30%
6W–14L · 44.4% of games
8.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 64.5% of games
8.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 58.2% of games
9.0mixed
84.6%
33W–6L · 61.9% of games
9.5mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
57 matches
#1 Singles
26%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
26 matches
Singles
6%
11 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert