← Search

Nicola Frazer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
CARMEL, IN
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 75W–27L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history102 matches
W
2026-10-24 · Indy C 8.5W IRCD Pruitt · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stacey Evans
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-10-03 · Indy C 8.5W IRCD Pruitt · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Aayushi Chudgar
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-3
W
2026-09-27 · Indy A40 4.5W PATC Squires · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Margaret Corbett
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-09-26 · Indy C 8.5W IRCD Pruitt · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Siby Hill
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-13 · Mid Tri W IRCD Pruitt · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Mattax
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-30 · Mid Tri W IRCD Pruitt · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Burkhardt
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · Mid Tri W IRCD Pruitt · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Corbett
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-23 · Mid Tri W IRCD Pruitt · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Corbett
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-17 · Mid Tri W IRCD Pruitt · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Burkhardt
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-11 · Mid Tri W IRCD Pruitt · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katelyn Hale Riley
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · Mid Tri W IRCD Pruitt · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katelyn Hale Riley
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-08-05 · High Tri W IRCD Pruitt · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katelyn Hale Riley
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
75%
6W–2L · 66.4% of games
4.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 70.9% of games
4.5
69.4%
34W–15L · 57.8% of games
7.5
100%
11W–0L · 71.4% of games
8.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 55.5% of games
10.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
24 matches
#1 Singles
9%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal