← Search

Colleen ONeal

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Zionsville, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
391 matches · 261W–130L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history391 matches
W
2026-10-31 · Indy C 8.5W IRCD Thompson · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alyson Neidlinger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-10-24 · Indy C 8.5W IRCD Thompson · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alana Feeley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-25 · Indy A55 8.0W CRC Trott · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Gold championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-09-02 · IN/Hullett/HighTriWomen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Henry
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-08-29 · Indy A55 8.0W CRC Trott · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristi Moschel championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-21 · Indy X18 9.0 BHS Hullett · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brandon Lew mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-14 · Indy X18 9.0 BHS Hullett · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gregory Fulling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · IN/Hullett/HighTriWomen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristi Moschel
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Harmon championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-05 · IN/Hullett/HighTriWomen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Martin
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-3
L
2026-08-03 · Indy A55 8.0W CRC Trott · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Emeline Davis
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 54.7% of games
3.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 55% of games
4.0
79.1%
91W–24L · 60.8% of games
4.5
48.6%
34W–36L · 50.4% of games
7.5
73.1%
19W–7L · 61.7% of games
8.0
64.3%
18W–10L · 59% of games
8.5
68.6%
35W–16L · 58.5% of games
9.0
0%
0W–4L · 31.3% of games
6.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 68.6% of games
7.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 76.2% of games
8.0mixed
52.9%
18W–16L · 51.4% of games
8.5mixed
85.7%
12W–2L · 62.4% of games
9.0mixed
64.5%
20W–11L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
121 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
100 matches
#1 Singles
21%
82 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
78 matches
#2 Singles
2%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer