← Search

Joline Schmitt

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Carmel, IN
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 90W–44L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history134 matches
W
2026-10-23 · Indy CX 8.5 CRC Weitzer · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Greer MacKebee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-10-16 · Indy CX 9.5 IRCD Redding · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Marius Schmitt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-03 · Indy C 8.5W PATC Squires · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with ANN KEATON
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-10-02 · Indy CX 9.5 IRCD Redding · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Marius Schmitt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-18 · Indy CX 8.5 CRC Weitzer · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Greer MacKebee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-13 · Mid Tri W IRCD Faulkenberg · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Galina Blomenkamp
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-09 · High Tri W IRCD Thompson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Barnes
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-02 · High Tri W IRCD Thompson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Miller
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-26 · High Tri W IRCD Thompson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Kowalski
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-23 · Mid Tri W IRCD Faulkenberg · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Miller
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-21 · Indy X18 9.0 CRC Weitzer · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Evan Golightly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-16 · Mid Tri W IRCD Faulkenberg · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kayla Treat
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 64.5% of games
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 47.6% of games
4.0
76.5%
13W–4L · 65.7% of games
4.5
62.5%
15W–9L · 58.6% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
94.7%
18W–1L · 63.7% of games
8.0mixed
71.4%
15W–6L · 58.3% of games
8.5mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 54.2% of games
9.0mixed
45%
9W–11L · 51.8% of games
9.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
36 matches
#1 Singles
17%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
21 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams