← Search

Elizabeth Reifeis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Carmel, IN
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
141 matches · 80W–61L · seasons 2018–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history141 matches
W
2026-10-11 · Indy A40 4.5W IRCD Fry · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Corbin-Mahaney
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-10-03 · Indy C 8.5W IRCD Leonard · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jamey Landry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-09 · High Tri W CRC Cox · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thays Rodrigues Cardoso
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-02 · High Tri W CRC Cox · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thays Rodrigues Cardoso
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-26 · High Tri W CRC Cox · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Leonard
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-5
L
2026-08-19 · High Tri W CRC Cox · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thays Rodrigues Cardoso
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-12 · High Tri W CRC Cox · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thays Rodrigues Cardoso
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-22 · Indy A40 4.5W NCHS Fry · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Corbin-Mahaney
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-20 · Indy A55 8.0W CRC Eicher · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michelle Burns
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-01 · Indy A40 4.5W NCHS Fry · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Corbin-Mahaney
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-29 · Indy A55 8.0W CRC Eicher · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Peterson
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-24 · Indy A40 4.5W NCHS Fry · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Corbin-Mahaney
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 30.4% of games
4.0
80%
8W–2L · 59.3% of games
4.5
55.3%
47W–38L · 53% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.5
55.2%
16W–13L · 52.7% of games
9.0
90%
9W–1L · 57.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova