← Search

Neddy Koech

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fishers, IN
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
231 matches · 153W–78L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history231 matches
W
2026-10-25 · Indy A40 4.5W IRCD Thompson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hema Wetzel
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-10-18 · Indy A40 4.5W IRCD Thompson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maria Thompson
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-16 · Indy CX 7.5 IRCE Golightly · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Edward Golightly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-11 · Indy CX 7.5 IRCE Golightly · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Edward Golightly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-10-04 · Indy C 7.5W IRCD Faulkenberg · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrea Hoffman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-10-04 · Indy A40 4.5W IRCD Thompson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hema Wetzel
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-20 · Indy C 7.5W IRCD Faulkenberg · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrea Hoffman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-26 · High Tri W IRCD Thompson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Morrison
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-3
L
2026-07-24 · Indy X18 8.0 IRCD Curtiss · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Declan Mast mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-22 · Indy A40 4.5W IRCD Thompson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katie Morrison
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-15 · Indy A40 4.5W IRCD Thompson · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hema Wetzel
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-10 · Indy X18 8.0 IRCD Curtiss · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gautam Petkar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 64.1% of games
3.5
84.4%
38W–7L · 63% of games
4.0
69.1%
47W–21L · 59.4% of games
4.5
46.8%
22W–25L · 47.4% of games
6.5
100%
7W–0L · 65.9% of games
7.5
61.9%
13W–8L · 59.8% of games
8.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 53% of games
6.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 58% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 48.8% of games
8.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
105 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
44 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer