← Search

Angela Davis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
243 matches · 101W–142L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history243 matches
L
2026-10-27 · Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Hittle · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Blakley
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-06 · Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Hittle · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marianne Vorhees
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-0
L
2026-10-04 · Indy C 7.5W PATC Olsen · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joanna Cieciek
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-09-29 · Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Hittle · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Heinbaugh
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-27 · Indy C 7.5W PATC Olsen · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen Halle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-20 · Indy C 7.5W PATC Olsen · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen Halle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-15 · Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Hittle · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marianne Vorhees
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-23 · Low Tri W IRCD Akers · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine McCann
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-20 · Indy A55 7.0W E IRCD Gupta · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Collins
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-13 · Indy A55 7.0W E IRCD Gupta · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Collins
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-10 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCE Coyne · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marianne Vorhees
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-06 · Low Tri W IRCD Akers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Fernandez
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
25%
1W–3L · 33.3% of games
4.0
50.4%
63W–62L · 49.8% of games
4.5
24%
12W–38L · 39.1% of games
7.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 51.8% of games
7.5
36.7%
11W–19L · 44.8% of games
8.0
35%
7W–13L · 41.7% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
80 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
41 matches
#1 Singles
10%
24 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe