← Search

Teresa Keller

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Muncie, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
271 matches · 200W–71L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history271 matches
L
2026-10-25 · Indy A65 8.0W IRCD Harker · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marianne Vorhees championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-24 · Indy A65 8.0W IRCD Harker · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marianne Vorhees championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-23 · Indy A65 8.0W IRCD Harker · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martha Harker championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-10-18 · Indy A40 4.5W IRCD Thompson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kourtney Cogdill
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-10 · Low Tri W MRC Kubek · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marianne Vorhees
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-03 · Low Tri W MRC Kubek · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Crabtree
loading the estimate
6-0, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-27 · Low Tri W MRC Kubek · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marianne Vorhees
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-11 · Indy A65 7.0W MRC Knapp · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristi Knapp
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-10 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Pruitt · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hema Suresh
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-06 · Low Tri W MRC Kubek · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marianne Vorhees
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-04 · Indy A65 7.0W MRC Knapp · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betsy Peckinpaugh
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-03 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Pruitt · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hema Suresh
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 55.8% of games
4.0
69.7%
69W–30L · 60.8% of games
4.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 52.7% of games
7.0
73.5%
25W–9L · 60.3% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
85.7%
66W–11L · 65.3% of games
7.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 57.6% of games
7.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
63.2%
12W–7L · 56.4% of games
8.5mixed
90%
9W–1L · 60.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
114 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
48 matches
#1 Singles
8%
22 matches
Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer