← Search

Jane Wenzel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 25W–26L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history51 matches
L
2026-10-04 · Indy C 7.5W IRCD Hittle · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Martha Harker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-09 · Indy 7.5W SAT IRCD Hittle · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Martha Harker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-02 · Indy 7.5W SAT IRCD Hittle · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Martha Harker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · Indy 7.5W SAT IRCD Hittle · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Martha Harker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-12-14 · CIN C 7.5W IRCD Hittle · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Martha Harker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-11-16 · CIN C 7.5W IRCD Hittle · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Radez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-11-02 · CIN C 7.5W IRCD Hittle · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marylu Kosiarek
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-08-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dawn Parks
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
2025-07-31 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vicki Shafer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vicki Shafer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vicki Shafer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Akers
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 43.8% of games
7.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 56.9% of games
7.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 52.6% of games
8.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe