← Search

Susan Akers

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pendleton, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
375 matches · 175W–200L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history375 matches
W
2026-10-03 · Indy A40 3.5W SAT IRCD Akers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Beck
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-08-23 · Low Tri W IRCD Akers · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Karen Halle
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-20 · Indy A55 7.0W E IRCD Akers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Beck
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · Indy A65 7.0W CRC Nelson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Myra Endris
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-06 · Low Tri W IRCD Akers · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Dahnya Chop
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · Indy A55 7.0W E IRCD Akers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie Barnes
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-09 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Hittle · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yating Jiang
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · Indy A65 7.0W CRC Nelson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary McAteer
loading the estimate
3-4
W
2026-07-06 · Indy A40 3.5W IRCD Dalton · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Theresa Verde
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-30 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Hittle · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacy Davis
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-26 · Indy A65 8.0W Bates · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Myra Endris
loading the estimate
2-8
L
2026-06-26 · Indy A65 8.0W Bates · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Myra Endris
loading the estimate
2-8
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
61.2%
63W–40L · 55.7% of games
4.0
29.5%
13W–31L · 41.9% of games
6.5
62.5%
15W–9L · 52% of games
7.0
59%
36W–25L · 53.9% of games
7.5
36.6%
15W–26L · 46% of games
8.0
20.8%
5W–19L · 36.6% of games
7.0mixed
34%
16W–31L · 47.5% of games
7.5mixed
50%
8W–8L · 46.8% of games
8.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
148 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
131 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
72 matches
#1 Singles
3%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
8 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert