← Search

Kelly Kirch

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
156 matches · 76W–80L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history156 matches
L
2026-07-16 · Indy A40 4.0W HawGCC Chop · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hannah Ott
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-09 · Indy A40 4.0W HawGCC Chop · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Wehner
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · Indy A18 3.5W HawGCC Flaningham · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jordan Allen
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · Indy A40 3.5W HawGCC Kirch · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maeve Guzek
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-24 · Indy A18 3.5W HawGCC Flaningham · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maeve Guzek
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-22 · Indy A40 3.5W HawGCC Kirch · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maeve Guzek
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · Indy A40 4.0W HawGCC Chop · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Weinberger
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-18 · Indy A40 4.0W HawGCC Chop · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynsay Wilson
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-15 · Indy A40 3.5W HawGCC Kirch · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maeve Guzek
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-11 · Indy A40 4.0W HawGCC Chop · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dahnya Chop
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · Indy A18 3.5W HawGCC Flaningham · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Wehner
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · Indy A40 3.5W HawGCC Kirch · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maeve Guzek
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
77.8%
14W–4L · 55.2% of games
3.0
59%
36W–25L · 52.2% of games
3.5
38.1%
16W–26L · 47.2% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 36.4% of games
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
29.2%
7W–17L · 45.6% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
26 matches
#1 Singles
8%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal