← Search

Catherine Miller

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 71W–49L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history120 matches
W
2026-10-25 · Indy CX 9.5 IRCD Redding · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with David Chader mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-10-23 · Indy CX 9.5 IRCD Redding · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Jason Denton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-10-04 · Indy CX 8.5 IRCD Redding · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Avery Hoppes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-25 · Indy CX 8.5 IRCD Redding · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mark Phillips mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-09-20 · Indy C 8.5W IRCD Thompson · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sheri Faulkenberg
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-18 · Indy CX 9.5 IRCD Redding · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Marius Schmitt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-09-02 · High Tri W IRCD Thompson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joline Schmitt
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-31 · Mid Tri W IRCD Faulkenberg · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Thompson
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · Mid Tri W IRCD Faulkenberg · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joline Schmitt
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-21 · Indy X18 9.0 NCHS Denton · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nick Batuello mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-14 · Indy X18 9.0 NCHS Denton · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Taylor Kinney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · High Tri W IRCD Thompson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Kowalski
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 49.1% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
58.6%
17W–12L · 56.3% of games
5.0
50%
6W–6L · 54.4% of games
8.5
60%
6W–4L · 57.5% of games
10.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 53.6% of games
8.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 56% of games
9.0mixed
63%
17W–10L · 53.3% of games
9.5mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
24 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert