← Search

Mark Phillips

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 93W–57L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history150 matches
W
2026-10-30 · Indy CX 7.5 IRCD Copeland · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carole McAteer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-10-23 · Indy CX 7.5 IRCD Copeland · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elyse Handel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-10-09 · Indy CX 8.5 IRCD Redding · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alyson Neidlinger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-10-04 · Indy CX 7.5 IRCD Copeland · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carole McAteer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-25 · Indy CX 8.5 IRCD Redding · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Catherine Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-09-18 · Indy CX 7.5 IRCD Copeland · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elyse Handel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-07 · Indy X18 9.0 NCHS Denton · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Claire Reifeis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · #2 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brady Wagenknecht championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-10 · Indy X18 9.0 NCHS Denton · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Claire Reifeis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · Indy A18 4.0M IRCD Bocade · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
100%
19W–0L · 84.3% of games
4.0
58.3%
28W–20L · 55.3% of games
4.5
20%
2W–8L · 40.5% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0%
0W–6L · 35.7% of games
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 75% of games
7.5mixed
100%
12W–0L · 74.6% of games
8.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 60.1% of games
8.5mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 53.9% of games
9.0mixed
48%
12W–13L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
49 matches
#1 Singles
31%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
14 matches
#2 Singles
6%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe