← Search

Landon Shell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fishers, IN
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
244 matches · 111W–133L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history244 matches
L
2026-10-30 · Indy CX 8.5 IRCD Shell · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sofia Soltis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-10-28 · Indy C 8.5M IRCD Shell · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brett Tanaka
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-10-16 · Indy CX 8.5 IRCD Shell · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sofia Soltis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-10-14 · Indy C 8.5M IRCD Shell · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Marco Vasquez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-10-09 · Indy CX 8.5 IRCD Shell · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Yaping Saran mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-03 · Indy CX 8.5 IRCD Shell · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sofia Soltis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-09-30 · Indy C 8.5M IRCD Shell · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kevin Alvarez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-09-16 · Indy C 8.5M IRCD Shell · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alex Mullet
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-08 · High Tri M IRCD Shell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dakota Smith
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-01 · High Tri M IRCD Shell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikhil Kulkarni
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
Default
2026-08-21 · Indy X18 9.0 CRC Weitzer · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amy Schmidt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-18 · High Tri M IRCD Shell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kaus Christopher
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
50%
2W–2L · 45.5% of games
3.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 42.6% of games
4.0
68.8%
11W–5L · 59.4% of games
4.5
52.3%
45W–41L · 48.9% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 46.9% of games
8.5
37.5%
15W–25L · 47% of games
10.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 37.2% of games
7.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
58.8%
20W–14L · 53.5% of games
8.5mixed
37.5%
6W–10L · 45.5% of games
9.0mixed
22.2%
4W–14L · 45.3% of games
9.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
117 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
72 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
45 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams