← Search

David Hu

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 27W–31L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history58 matches
L
2026-10-12 · Indy C 7.5M IRCD Jackson · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Douglas Gernert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-09 · Indy CX 8.5 CRC Kim · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ceanne Elliott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-05 · Indy C 7.5M IRCD Jackson · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Winter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-30 · Indy C 8.5M IRCD Dang · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Evan Golightly
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-28 · Indy C 7.5M IRCD Jackson · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Douglas Gernert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-21 · Indy C 7.5M IRCD Jackson · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with JIM Bohrer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-3
W
2026-09-18 · Indy CX 7.5 CRC Kim · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Slowikowski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-09-16 · Indy C 8.5M IRCD Dang · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Vinh Dang
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-10 · Low Tri M IRCD Copeland · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephen Short
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-09-03 · Low Tri M IRCD Copeland · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chaowapong Jarasvaraparn
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-14 · Indy X18 8.0 IRCE Holly · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leah Gehring mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-13 · Low Tri M IRCD Copeland · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chaowapong Jarasvaraparn
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 59.1% of games
7.5
22.2%
4W–14L · 45% of games
8.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 36.2% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 52.5% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 47.4% of games
8.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
11 matches
#1 Singles
14%
8 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer