← Search

Michael Broderick

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Zionsville, IN
4.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
15 matches · 5W–10L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history15 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Low Tri M IRCD Kepner · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steven Brown
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-13 · Low Tri M IRCD Kepner · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Keith Pringle
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-14 · CIN CX 7.5 IRCD Cook · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Broderick mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-03 · CIN CX 7.5 IRCD Cook · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Broderick mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2022-12-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Craig Tammen
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2022-11-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steve Ferguson
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2020-03-10 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 4.0 M, Langford (IHP) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tony Smith
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2020-02-25 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 4.0 M, Langford (IHP) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Strenski
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2020-01-28 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 4.0 M, Langford (IHP) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tony Smith
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2020-01-14 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 4.0 M, Langford (IHP) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Strenski
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2019-07-18 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 4.0 M, Strenski (PT) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Langford
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2019-07-11 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 4.0 M, Strenski (PT) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Strenski
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 43.5% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 67% of the time
#2 Doubles
67%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal