← Search

Martin Venarotti

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Zionsville, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 34W–14L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history48 matches
W
2026-10-26 · Indy C 7.5M PATC Walpole · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Craig Witmer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-4
W
2026-10-19 · Indy C 7.5M PATC Walpole · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Peter Walpole
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-09-21 · Indy C 7.5M PATC Walpole · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jose Luis de Alba
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-1
W
2026-09-14 · Indy C 7.5M PATC Walpole · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jose Luis de Alba
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-20 · Indy A18 3.5M CRC Koval · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Walpole
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-13 · Indy A18 3.5M CRC Koval · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Walpole
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-06 · Indy A18 3.5M CRC Koval · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Walpole
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-04-28 · Indy 7.5M PATC Walpole · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Damian Rosales
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-27 · Indy 7.5M PATC Walpole · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Peter Walpole
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-20 · Indy 7.5M PATC Walpole · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Geng Wang
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-13 · Indy 7.5M PATC Walpole · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Damian Rosales
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-06 · Indy 7.5M PATC Walpole · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Peter Walpole
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
82.4%
14W–3L · 60.5% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
76.9%
20W–6L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 67% of the time
#1 Doubles
67%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
3 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams