← Search

Yaping Saran

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Westfield, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
230 matches · 117W–113L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history230 matches
L
2026-10-31 · Indy C 8.5W PATC Squires · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Raquel Richardson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-30 · Indy CX 8.5 IRCD Shell · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alex Mullet mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-13 · Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Faulkenberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Lynch
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-3
L
2026-10-10 · Indy C 8.5W PATC Squires · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Emily Wandel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-09 · Indy CX 8.5 IRCD Shell · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Landon Shell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-29 · Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Faulkenberg · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-09-26 · Indy CX 8.5 IRCD Shell · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nikhil Kulkarni mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-24 · Indy X18 8.0 IRCD Chien · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marco Vasquez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Deckard · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janis Buesching
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-20 · Indy A18 4.5W IRCD Somers · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Deckard
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-13 · Indy A18 4.5W IRCD Somers · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nancy Clemens
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-11 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Faulkenberg · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Burns
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
69.4%
25W–11L · 56.8% of games
4.0
47.2%
34W–38L · 47.9% of games
4.5
10%
1W–9L · 22.7% of games
7.5
47.4%
9W–10L · 48% of games
8.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 39.5% of games
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 56% of games
7.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.2% of games
8.0mixed
53.8%
14W–12L · 51.2% of games
8.5mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 25% of the time
#2 Doubles
25%
57 matches
#1 Singles
23%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
34 matches
Singles
13%
30 matches
#2 Singles
5%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer