← Search

Janis Buesching

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Zionsville, IN
4.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
181 matches · 95W–86L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history181 matches
L
2026-08-07 · Indy X18 8.0 IRCD Chien · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Micah Lacefield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-31 · Indy X18 8.0 IRCD Chien · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Alvarez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-21 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Deckard · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yaping Saran
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-19 · Indy X18 8.0 IRCD Chien · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Micah Lacefield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · Indy X18 8.0 IRCD Chien · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Micah Lacefield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-1
W
2026-07-07 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Deckard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yaping Saran
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-29 · Indy 7.5W TUE IRCD Deckard · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Britani Sepanski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-21 · Indy 7.5W TUE IRCD Deckard · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim Rhebergen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-07 · Indy 7.5W TUE IRCD Deckard · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Britani Sepanski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-24 · Indy 7.5W TUE IRCD Deckard · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Britani Sepanski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-03-10 · Indy A18 4.0W TUE IRCD Deckard · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Carsello
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-07 · Indy A18 4.0W TUE IRCD Deckard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meaghan Chien
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.7% of games
3.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 57% of games
3.5
61.3%
19W–12L · 54.2% of games
4.0
40.5%
17W–25L · 48.2% of games
6.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 51.9% of games
7.5
61.8%
21W–13L · 57.3% of games
3.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 62.1% of games
8.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
76 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
30 matches
#1 Singles
5%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova