← Search

Emily Carsello

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 55W–53L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2020. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history108 matches
W
2026-07-16 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Hittle · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Pychinka
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Deckard · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cecilia Perez Moreno
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-18 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Hittle · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Combs
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-16 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Deckard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Clemens
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-02 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Deckard · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Wolf
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-28 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Hittle · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cecilia Perez Moreno
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-03-10 · Indy A18 4.0W TUE IRCD Deckard · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janis Buesching
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-02-24 · Indy A18 4.0W TUE IRCD Deckard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cecilia Perez Moreno
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-17 · Indy A18 4.0W TUE IRCD Deckard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cecilia Perez Moreno
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-10 · Indy A18 4.0W TUE IRCD Deckard · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Wolf
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-01-27 · Indy A18 4.0W TUE IRCD Deckard · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cecilia Perez Moreno
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-01-17 · Indy A18 4.0W TUE IRCD Deckard · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cecilia Perez Moreno
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
75%
6W–2L · 67.4% of games
3.5
64%
16W–9L · 56.1% of games
4.0
36.8%
21W–36L · 43.4% of games
6.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.1% of games
7.5
70%
7W–3L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
22 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova