← Search

Nancy Clemens

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Carmel, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
315 matches · 190W–125L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history315 matches
L
2026-07-13 · Indy A18 4.5W IRCD Somers · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Yaping Saran
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-07 · Indy A18 4.5W IRCD Somers · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Wilkerson
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-30 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Deckard · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meaghan Chien
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-06-23 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Deckard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Deckard
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-22 · Indy A18 4.5W IRCD Somers · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Deckard
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-16 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Deckard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Carsello
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-01 · Indy A18 4.5W IRCD Somers · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Meaghan Chien
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-26 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Deckard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Deckard
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-29 · Indy 7.5W TUE IRCD Deckard · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susie Rosenstihl
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-31 · Indy 7.5W TUE IRCD Deckard · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susie Rosenstihl
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-4, 0-1
W
2026-03-24 · Indy 7.5W TUE IRCD Deckard · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susie Rosenstihl
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-17 · Indy 7.5W TUE IRCD Deckard · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susie Rosenstihl
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
81.2%
13W–3L · 64.8% of games
3.5
75.4%
46W–15L · 56.8% of games
4.0
48.8%
39W–41L · 48.3% of games
4.5
7.1%
1W–13L · 32.5% of games
6.5
68.2%
15W–7L · 59.1% of games
7.5
54.5%
30W–25L · 52.7% of games
8.5
0%
0W–4L · 36.5% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80%
32W–8L · 61.8% of games
7.5mixed
50%
7W–7L · 49.6% of games
8.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 59.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
139 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
109 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
57 matches
#1 Singles
1%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer