← Search

Liz Shock

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fishers, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
259 matches · 165W–94L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history259 matches
W
2026-11-01 · Indy C 7.5W IRCD Brown · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laurie Schneider
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-06 · Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Somers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maura Lee
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-03 · Indy C 8.5W IRCD Somers · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Sing
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-3
W
2026-09-20 · Indy C 7.5W IRCD Brown · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laurie Schneider
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-24 · Mid Tri W IRCD Somers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Brown
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-16 · Mid Tri W IRCD Somers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Raquel Richardson
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-09 · Mid Tri W IRCD Somers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Raquel Richardson
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-16 · Indy A40 4.0W DCC Somers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Brown
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-14 · Indy A18 4.0W LNHS Ackerman · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Brown
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · Indy A18 4.0W LNHS Ackerman · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Brown
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-29 · Indy A18 4.5W IRCD Somers · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Meaghan Chien
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-23 · Indy A18 4.0W LNHS Ackerman · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Raquel Richardson
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
89.7%
26W–3L · 69% of games
3.5
57.8%
37W–27L · 55.2% of games
4.0
61%
36W–23L · 53.9% of games
4.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 33.3% of games
6.5
77.3%
17W–5L · 62.2% of games
7.5
65.8%
25W–13L · 56.9% of games
8.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 50% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 45.5% of games
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 59.3% of games
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
80 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
64 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
56 matches
#1 Singles
20%
52 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert