← Search

Sarah Brown

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
327 matches · 172W–155L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history327 matches
W
2026-10-24 · Indy C 8.5W IRCD Somers · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Maureen Hubbard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-29 · Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Somers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janette Martin
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-20 · Indy C 7.5W IRCD Brown · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michaela Hammel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-0, 0-1
L
2026-08-24 · Mid Tri W IRCD Somers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Shock
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-23 · Mid Tri W IRCD Somers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelby Ackerman
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-08-03 · Mid Tri W IRCD Somers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heidi Somers
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-21 · Indy A18 4.0W LNHS Ackerman · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michaela Hammel
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-20 · Indy A18 4.5W IRCD Somers · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Raquel Richardson
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-16 · Indy A40 4.0W DCC Somers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz Shock
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-14 · Indy A18 4.0W LNHS Ackerman · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz Shock
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · Indy A40 4.0W DCC Somers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Raquel Richardson
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · Indy A18 4.0W LNHS Ackerman · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz Shock
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 52.8% of games
3.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.3% of games
3.5
72%
67W–26L · 60.2% of games
4.0
38.4%
33W–53L · 46.1% of games
4.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 42.4% of games
6.5
62.1%
18W–11L · 54.5% of games
7.5
57.4%
27W–20L · 53.3% of games
8.5
25%
2W–6L · 40.9% of games
6.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 43% of games
6.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 57.1% of games
7.0mixed
21.7%
5W–18L · 43% of games
7.5mixed
70%
7W–3L · 57% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
125 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
112 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
81 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams