← Search

Sarah Steele

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Noblesville, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 36W–12L · seasons 2022–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history48 matches
W
2026-07-21 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Deckard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Medler
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Deckard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Medler
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-6
L
2026-06-30 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Deckard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Medler
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-02 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Deckard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Medler
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-29 · Indy 7.5W TUE IRCD Brown · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Medler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-08 · Indy 7.5W TUE IRCD Brown · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Medler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-28 · Indy 7.5W TUE IRCD Brown · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Medler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-24 · Indy 7.5W TUE IRCD Brown · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Medler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-17 · Indy 7.5W TUE IRCD Brown · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Medler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-03-10 · Indy A18 4.0W TUE IRCD Deckard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Medler
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-3
W
2026-01-27 · Indy A18 4.0W TUE IRCD Deckard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Medler
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-01-24 · Indy A18 4.0W TUE IRCD Deckard · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Medler
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
100%
7W–0L · 81% of games
3.5
92.9%
13W–1L · 65.8% of games
4.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 52.3% of games
6.5
50%
4W–4L · 52.5% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 52.7% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
29 matches
#1 Singles
19%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe