← Search

Charlene Tay

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
190 matches · 137W–53L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history190 matches
L
2026-10-11 · Indy C 7.5W IRCD Faulkenberg · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Linda Burwell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-09-27 · Indy C 7.5W IRCD Faulkenberg · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ann Osuntokun
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheri Faulkenberg championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-31 · Indy X18 8.0 IRCD Curtiss · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chong Cha mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-10 · Indy X18 8.0 IRCD Curtiss · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chaowapong Jarasvaraparn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-07 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Faulkenberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leah Gehring
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-30 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Faulkenberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheri Faulkenberg
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-16 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Faulkenberg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Patterson
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheri Faulkenberg championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-02 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Faulkenberg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Saumya Somasi
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-26 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Faulkenberg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erica Curtiss
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-29 · Indy 7.5W TUE IRCD Gupta · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allison Ditto
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
2.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 67.8% of games
3.0
69.6%
16W–7L · 61.8% of games
3.5
81%
17W–4L · 63.2% of games
4.0
53.6%
15W–13L · 49.7% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
22W–0L · 73.7% of games
7.5
61.5%
16W–10L · 58.5% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
83.3%
20W–4L · 64.5% of games
6.5mixed
100%
6W–0L · 65.2% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 59.7% of games
7.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 41.4% of games
8.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
76 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
40 matches
#1 Singles
7%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe