← Search

Greer MacKebee

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Carmel, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
109 matches · 65W–44L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history109 matches
L
2026-10-28 · Indy C 8.5M IRCD Dang · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jonathan Batuello
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-23 · Indy CX 8.5 CRC Weitzer · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Joline Schmitt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-10-14 · Indy C 8.5M IRCD Dang · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Paul Podgorny
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-09 · Indy CX 8.5 CRC Weitzer · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Connie Glass mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-07 · Indy C 8.5M IRCD Dang · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jonathan Batuello
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-03 · Indy CX 8.5 CRC Weitzer · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ruth Gaston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-30 · Indy C 8.5M IRCD Dang · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jonathan Batuello
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-09-23 · Indy C 8.5M IRCD Dang · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jonathan Batuello
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-18 · Indy CX 8.5 CRC Weitzer · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Joline Schmitt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-16 · Indy C 8.5M IRCD Dang · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jonathan Batuello
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-09-09 · Mid Tri M IRCD Redding · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Redding
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-08 · High Tri M IRCD Batuello · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Landis
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
50%
4W–4L · 52.8% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
80.8%
21W–5L · 60.7% of games
4.5
31.2%
5W–11L · 47.3% of games
7.5
80%
4W–1L · 58.3% of games
8.5
44.4%
12W–15L · 47.2% of games
7.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 63.6% of games
8.0mixed
80%
12W–3L · 61.3% of games
8.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 45.3% of games
9.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
29 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova