← Search

Connor Dunn

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Carmel, IN
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
77 matches · 43W–34L · seasons 2024–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2025. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history77 matches
L
2026-10-07 · Indy C 8.5M IRCD Shell · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brett Tanaka
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-09-30 · Indy C 8.5M IRCD Shell · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brett Tanaka
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-16 · Indy C 8.5M IRCD Shell · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brett Tanaka
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-08 · High Tri M IRCD Shell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marius Schmitt
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · High Tri M IRCD Shell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marius Schmitt
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-16 · IN/Whitener/A18&Over5.0M · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with David Chader championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-08-15 · IN/Whitener/A18&Over5.0M · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with David Chader championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-08-15 · IN/Whitener/A18&Over5.0M · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Tom Ciszewski championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-13 · High Tri M IRCD Shell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Miguel Flores
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-11 · High Tri M IRCD Shell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikhil Kulkarni
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · IN/Whitener/A18&Over5.0M · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with David Chader championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-07 · Indy X18 9.0 CRC Weitzer · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Hannah Shell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.8% of games
5.0
62.5%
15W–9L · 57.1% of games
8.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 56.1% of games
10.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 43.3% of games
9.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 51.9% of games
9.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
14 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe