← Search

Jackson Barrett

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fishers, IN
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
225 matches · 153W–72L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history225 matches
L
2026-10-21 · Indy C 8.5M IRCD Stoddard · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jay Wetzel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-10-14 · Indy C 8.5M IRCD Stoddard · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Toby Gaynor
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-5, 1-0
W
2026-10-07 · Indy C 8.5M IRCD Stoddard · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Toby Gaynor
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-09-23 · Indy C 8.5M IRCD Stoddard · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Toby Gaynor
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-16 · Indy C 8.5M IRCD Stoddard · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jason Hostetler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-09 · Mid Tri M DCC Barrett · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Moody
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-02 · Mid Tri M DCC Barrett · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jay Wetzel
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · Mid Tri M DCC Barrett · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Stoddard
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Barrett championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Barrett championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Barrett championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Barrett championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 57.1% of games
3.5
50%
4W–4L · 52.1% of games
4.0
74.1%
43W–15L · 58.9% of games
4.5
50%
27W–27L · 50.1% of games
7.5
100%
4W–0L · 70% of games
8.5
75%
39W–13L · 59.3% of games
8.0mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 62.1% of games
9.0mixed
64%
16W–9L · 56.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
89 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
82 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
38 matches
#1 Singles
5%
11 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams