← Search

Jessica Wilkerson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
218 matches · 160W–58L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history218 matches
W
2026-10-25 · Indy C 7.5W JCC Lane · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nancy Gunderson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-10-18 · Indy C 7.5W JCC Lane · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michele McCarthy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-5, 0-1
L
2026-09-27 · Indy C 7.5W JCC Lane · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Ball
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-14 · Indy A18 4.0W LNHS Ackerman · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michaela Hammel
loading the estimate
2-6
L
2026-07-07 · Indy A18 4.5W IRCD Somers · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nancy Clemens
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
Default
2026-06-30 · Indy A18 4.0W LNHS Ackerman · #2 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-26 · Indy X18 8.0 NCHS Redding · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Landis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · Indy 7.5W SAT IRCD Somers · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dahnya Chop
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · Indy 8.5W IRCD Somers · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Zoy Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6
W
2026-04-25 · Indy 7.5W SAT IRCD Somers · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sonia Fuller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-04-11 · Indy 7.5W SAT IRCD Somers · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Kirch
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-08 · Indy A18 4.0W SUN IRCD Brown · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michaela Hammel
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 70.9% of games
3.5
92.5%
37W–3L · 69.9% of games
4.0
61.5%
16W–10L · 52% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
83.3%
15W–3L · 63.6% of games
7.5
76.3%
29W–9L · 56.8% of games
8.5
25%
1W–3L · 38.1% of games
7.0mixed
79.5%
31W–8L · 60.7% of games
7.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.9% of games
8.0mixed
46.7%
14W–16L · 50.2% of games
8.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 49.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
58 matches
#1 Singles
9%
19 matches
#2 Singles
6%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal