← Search

Karyn ODonnell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
242 matches · 134W–108L · seasons 2018–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2023. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history242 matches
W
2026-10-31 · Indy C 8.5W IRCD Thompson · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jennifer Kowalski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-04 · Indy A40 4.5W IRCD Curtiss · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-27 · Indy A40 4.5W IRCD Curtiss · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erica Curtiss
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-02 · High Tri W IRCD Pruitt · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lesley Cahalan
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-31 · Mid Tri W IRCD Faulkenberg · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Belinda Denning
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-26 · High Tri W IRCD Pruitt · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lesley Cahalan
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-08-19 · High Tri W IRCD Pruitt · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lesley Cahalan
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · High Tri W IRCD Pruitt · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vicki Valandra
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-11 · Mid Tri W IRCD Faulkenberg · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leah Gehring
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-05 · High Tri W IRCD Pruitt · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vicki Valandra
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-5
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maureen Hubbard championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-16 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Faulkenberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martha Harker
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 45.5% of games
4.0
66.4%
97W–49L · 55.7% of games
4.5
28.1%
9W–23L · 39.4% of games
7.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 54.3% of games
8.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 40.9% of games
7.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 43.5% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
38.1%
8W–13L · 44.4% of games
8.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
67 matches
#1 Singles
16%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
37 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer