← Search

Chris Lyon

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
South Bend, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 71W–33L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history104 matches
L
2026-10-25 · NIN SB Combo 8.5 W: SBRC George · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kelly Moore
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-0, 0-1
L
2026-10-14 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W Day: SBRC Gerber/Graham · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tina Caravette
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-1
W
2026-09-30 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W Day: SBRC Gerber/Graham · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tina Caravette
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-09-23 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W Day: SBRC Gerber/Graham · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chelsea Kaniewski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-08 · NIN SB 18&O 4.0 W: SBRC Widner/Kelly · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melinda Romanetz championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · NIN SB 40&O 4.0 W: SBRC Kelly/Devetski · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melinda Romanetz championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-01 · NIN SB 18&O 4.0 W: SBRC Widner/Kelly · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Minatel championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-16 · NIN SB 18&O 4.0 W: SBRC Widner/Kelly · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brita Miller
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · NIN SB 40&O 4.0 W: SBRC Kelly/Devetski · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melinda Romanetz
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-09 · NIN SB 18&O 4.0 W: SBRC Widner/Kelly · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Gerber
loading the estimate
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · NIN SB 40&O 4.0 W: SBRC Kelly/Devetski · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Gerber
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-17 · NIN SB 40&O 4.0 W: SBRC Kelly/Devetski · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Anthony
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 65.9% of games
4.0
81.2%
39W–9L · 61.9% of games
4.5
50%
6W–6L · 48.5% of games
7.5
60%
9W–6L · 56.2% of games
8.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 46.9% of games
8.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
18 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal