← Search

Megan Striegel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Granger, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
238 matches · 145W–93L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history238 matches
L
2026-11-01 · NIN SB Combo 8.5 W: SBRC George · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Susan Kempf
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
Default
2026-10-11 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Meggan Amour
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-10-10 · NIN SB Combo 6.5 W: SBRC Weedman/George · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jen Stiffler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-10-03 · NIN SB Combo 6.5 W: SBRC Weedman/George · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jen Stiffler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-09-26 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W: SBRC Gerber · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Felicia Chiu
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · NIN SB 40&O 4.0 W: SBRC Kelly/Devetski · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keli Rodriguez championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-16 · NIN SB 18&O 4.0 W: SBRC George/Brown · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren McCarthy
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · NIN SB 40&O 4.0 W: SBRC Kelly/Devetski · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keli Rodriguez
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-08 · NIN SB 40&O 4.0 W: SBRC Kelly/Devetski · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Basil
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-07-02 · NIN SB 18&O 4.0 W: SBRC George/Brown · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon MacK
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
Default
2026-06-25 · NIN SB 18&O 4.0 W: SBRC George/Brown · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jasmine Shim
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-24 · NIN SB 40&O 4.0 W: SBRC Kelly/Devetski · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Devetski
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 54.9% of games
3.0
90.9%
20W–2L · 77.1% of games
3.5
63.6%
21W–12L · 55.3% of games
4.0
44.2%
23W–29L · 46.6% of games
5.5
75%
6W–2L · 63.3% of games
6.5
58.5%
24W–17L · 55.3% of games
7.5
63.6%
14W–8L · 57.2% of games
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 39.1% of games
7.0mixed
69.7%
23W–10L · 55.9% of games
8.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 57% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
92 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
83 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
53 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova