← Search

Maci Doden

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Wayne, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
142 matches · 101W–41L · seasons 2022–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history142 matches
W
2026-10-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Wilson championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-10-23 · NIN FW Combo 7.5 W: WW Otten/Mey · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bethany Sinclair
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-10-17 · NIN FW Combo 7.5 W: WW Otten/Mey · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Deb Hewes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-09 · NIN FW Combo 7.5 W: WW Otten/Mey · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Liz Quehl
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-25 · NIN FW Combo 7.5 W: WW Otten/Mey · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sandra Sweet
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-23 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Grabill · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-23 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Grabill · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Smith championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-22 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Grabill · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Smith championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-21 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Grabill · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Smith championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-08-08 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Grabill · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Smith championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Grabill · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Smith championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Cowan championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
76.2%
16W–5L · 58.9% of games
3.5
81.2%
13W–3L · 65.8% of games
4.0
74.4%
32W–11L · 61.9% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 44.7% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 63.4% of games
7.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 55.4% of games
7.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 53.7% of games
8.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
23 matches
#1 Singles
16%
22 matches
Singles
11%
15 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova