← Search

Bethany Sinclair

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Wayne, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
250 matches · 133W–117L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history250 matches
L
2026-10-31 · NIN FW 18&O Tri-Level 3.0,3.5,4.0 W: Jakacki/Gregory · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Teresa Freeman championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-30 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: WW Sinclair · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Wendy Sather
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-10-24 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: WW Sinclair · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kimberly Cowan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-10-23 · NIN FW Combo 7.5 W: WW Otten/Mey · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maci Doden
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-10-02 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: WW Sinclair · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Denise Cleveland
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-19 · NIN FW Combo 7.5 W: WW Otten/Mey · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Taryn Wemhoff
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-18 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: WW Sinclair · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Wendy Sather
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-12 · NIN FW Combo 7.5 W: WW Otten/Mey · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Taryn Wemhoff
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-09-11 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: WW Sinclair · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Wendy Sather
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-07-28 · NIN FW 18&O 3.5 W: WW Sinclair · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Daman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-27 · NIN FW 40&O 3.5 W: WW Sather · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindi Camp
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-23 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Klinker/Wildrick · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Szaferski
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
50%
7W–7L · 49.4% of games
3.5
64.1%
41W–23L · 57.9% of games
4.0
40%
10W–15L · 44.3% of games
6.5
69.7%
23W–10L · 58% of games
7.5
70.4%
19W–8L · 58.1% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 49.2% of games
7.0mixed
34.4%
22W–42L · 42% of games
8.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
107 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
73 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
61 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova