← Search

Kristine Valcarcel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Wayne, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
255 matches · 118W–137L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history255 matches
W
2026-11-01 · NIN FW MXD 55&O 7.0: White · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Koehl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-10-30 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: WW Rosales · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Krahn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-30 · NIN FW MXD 55&O 6.0: White/Jakacki · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jason Sagan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-10-10 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: WW Rosales · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Krahn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-10-09 · NIN FW Combo 7.5 W: WW Rosales/Phllips · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melinda Rosales
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-19 · NIN FW Combo 7.5 W: WW Rosales/Phllips · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melinda Rosales
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-12 · NIN FW Combo 7.5 W: WW Rosales/Phllips · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Debbie Wildrick
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-11 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: WW Rosales · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melinda Rosales
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · NIN FW 40&O 3.0 W: WW Gregory/Jakacki · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristina Robertson championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-02 · NIN FW 40&O 3.0 W: WW Gregory/Jakacki · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristina Robertson championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-30 · NIN FW 40&O 3.0 W: WW Gregory/Jakacki · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristina Robertson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-27 · NIN FW 40&O 3.5 W: WW Rosales/Dormeier · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melinda Rosales
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
53%
35W–31L · 51.7% of games
3.5
22.9%
8W–27L · 38.6% of games
5.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 59.6% of games
6.0
60%
6W–4L · 55.9% of games
6.5
55.6%
15W–12L · 50.1% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
46.2%
24W–28L · 49.9% of games
7.0mixed
43.8%
21W–27L · 45.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
81 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
58 matches
#1 Singles
6%
16 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert