← Search

Cindy Friend

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Wayne, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
256 matches · 160W–96L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history256 matches
L
2026-10-25 · NIN FW MXD 55&O 6.0: Scrogham · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Greg Salway mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-24 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: WW Sinclair · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Cahill
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-18 · NIN FW MXD 55&O 6.0: Scrogham · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brian Hart mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-16 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: WW Sinclair · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristina Robertson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-10-10 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: WW Sinclair · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christine Hutchins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-26 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: WW Sinclair · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shelly Meyer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-18 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: WW Sinclair · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Diann Solloway
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · NIN FW 40&O 3.0 W: WW Gregory/Jakacki · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sherrill Skelly championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-20 · NIN FW 40&O 3.5 W: WW Meyer/Wilson · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Lackey
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-16 · NIN FW 40&O 3.0 W: WW Gregory/Jakacki · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sherrill Skelly
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · NIN FW 40&O 3.0 W: WW Gregory/Jakacki · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristina Robertson
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-06 · NIN FW 40&O 3.5 W: WW Meyer/Wilson · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristina Robertson
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
69%
49W–22L · 58.9% of games
3.5
38.7%
12W–19L · 46% of games
5.5
70%
14W–6L · 64.1% of games
6.0
68.2%
15W–7L · 55.5% of games
6.5
55.6%
15W–12L · 47.2% of games
7.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 56.7% of games
6.0mixed
67.4%
31W–15L · 58.2% of games
7.0mixed
54.2%
13W–11L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
89 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
76 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
11 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer