← Search

Johanna Ducker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Roanoke, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
140 matches · 37W–103L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history140 matches
L
2026-10-30 · NIN FW MXD 55&O 6.0: Scrogham · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Ducker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-10-25 · NIN FW MXD 55&O 6.0: Scrogham · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Kaufman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-16 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie Weigert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-10-10 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie Weigert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-2
L
2026-10-04 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dana Frappier
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-3
L
2026-08-01 · NIN FW 18&O 3.0 W: WW Heastan · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Stark championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-30 · NIN FW 40&O 3.0 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · NIN FW 40&O 3.0 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Frappier
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · NIN FW 18&O 3.5 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Roberson
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-21 · NIN FW 18&O 3.5 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marsha Bormann
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-16 · NIN FW 40&O 3.0 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Frappier
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · NIN FW 18&O 3.0 W: WW Heastan · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Stark
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
40%
22W–33L · 46.5% of games
3.5
6.2%
3W–45L · 30.1% of games
5.5
50%
4W–4L · 50% of games
6.0
30%
3W–7L · 44.4% of games
6.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 37.3% of games
6.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
27 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer