← Search

Marsha Bormann

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Wayne, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
124 matches · 39W–85L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history124 matches
L
2026-10-24 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Saiarya Katkar
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-09 · NIN FW Combo 5.5 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Krysta Buckner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-04 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Parker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-19 · NIN FW Combo 5.5 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Vicki Armold
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-09-11 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joan Collar
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-29 · NIN FW 40&O 3.0 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joan Greenlee
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-28 · NIN FW 18&O 3.5 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Luarde
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-21 · NIN FW 18&O 3.5 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Johanna Ducker
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-16 · NIN FW 40&O 3.0 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachel Loechner
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-13 · NIN FW 40&O 3.0 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Caroline Nietert
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · NIN FW 18&O 3.0 W: WW Heastan · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cathy Diamente
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-07 · NIN FW 18&O 3.5 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Johanna Ducker
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
45.8%
22W–26L · 48.7% of games
3.5
15.9%
7W–37L · 33.4% of games
5.5
20%
3W–12L · 39.4% of games
6.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 52.9% of games
6.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 34.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
23 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams