← Search

Cathy Diamente

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Wayne, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 48W–56L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history104 matches
W
2026-10-24 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Margaret Neese
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-10-16 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Margaret Neese
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-10-09 · NIN FW Combo 5.5 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Rachel Loechner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-10-03 · NIN FW Combo 5.5 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Krysta Buckner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-10-02 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joan Greenlee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-09-26 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Krysta Buckner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-01 · NIN FW 18&O 3.0 W: WW Heastan · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Hellinger championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-30 · NIN FW 40&O 3.0 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Hellinger
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · NIN FW 40&O 3.0 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Hellinger
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-28 · NIN FW 18&O 3.5 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Hellinger
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · NIN FW 18&O 3.0 W: WW Heastan · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Hellinger
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-21 · NIN FW 18&O 3.5 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Hellinger
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
69.4%
25W–11L · 57.1% of games
3.5
20%
9W–36L · 38.4% of games
5.5
100%
4W–0L · 66.2% of games
6.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 55.2% of games
6.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 46.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal