← Search

Nina Levenda

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Wayne, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
110 matches · 73W–37L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history110 matches
W
2026-10-30 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: WW Rosales · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rowena Yu-Mendador
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-10-24 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: WW Rosales · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hannah Winchester
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-23 · NIN FW Combo 7.5 W: WW Rosales/Phllips · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melinda Rosales
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-25 · NIN FW Combo 7.5 W: WW Rosales/Phllips · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Teresa Freeman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-19 · NIN MXD 40&O 7.0: Rosales · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert White mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-18 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: WW Rosales · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hannah Winchester
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-09-12 · NIN FW Combo 7.5 W: WW Rosales/Phllips · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Victoria Cornell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-30 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Plemich · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Freeman
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-27 · NIN FW 40&O 3.5 W: WW Rosales/Dormeier · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luanne Erdos
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Plemich · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Westhoff
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-14 · NIN FW 18&O 3.5 W: WW Rosales/Valcarcel · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Plemich · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Plemich
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 69.8% of games
3.5
74.4%
32W–11L · 58.8% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 36.9% of games
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 53.9% of games
7.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 39.5% of games
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 61.8% of games
7.0mixed
74.1%
20W–7L · 59.6% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 31.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
26 matches
#1 Singles
18%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
17 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer