← Search

Kathleen Markley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Wayne, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
265 matches · 181W–84L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history265 matches
L
2026-10-25 · NIN FW A 65&O 6.0 W: WW Heastan · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Virginia Zimmerman championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-24 · NIN FW A 65&O 6.0 W: WW Heastan · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Virginia Zimmerman championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-10-02 · NIN FW A 65&O 6.0 W: WW Heastan · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Virginia Zimmerman
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-25 · NIN FW Combo 7.5 W: WW Wilson/Cowan · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chloe Smithley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-19 · NIN FW Combo 7.5 W: WW Wilson/Cowan · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Abby Wilson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-09-18 · NIN FW A 65&O 6.0 W: WW Heastan · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Virginia Zimmerman
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-12 · NIN FW Combo 7.5 W: WW Wilson/Cowan · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chloe Smithley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-11 · NIN FW A 65&O 6.0 W: WW Heastan · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Vicki Armold
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-28 · NIN FW A 65&O 6.0 W: WW Heastan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Vicki Armold
loading the estimate
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-21 · NIN FW A 65&O 6.0 W: WW Heastan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Vicki Armold
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-14 · NIN FW A 65&O 6.0 W: WW Heastan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Vicki Armold
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Wallstrom championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 61.3% of games
3.5
78.2%
68W–19L · 58.4% of games
4.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 43.3% of games
6.0
64%
16W–9L · 57.2% of games
6.5
80%
12W–3L · 60.8% of games
7.0
60%
12W–8L · 55.9% of games
7.5
77.3%
17W–5L · 58.6% of games
8.5
66.7%
12W–6L · 56.1% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
68.8%
22W–10L · 58.6% of games
8.0mixed
41.7%
10W–14L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
106 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
94 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
58 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe