← Search

Megan Wilson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Wayne, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
231 matches · 162W–69L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history231 matches
W
2026-10-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maci Doden championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-10-17 · NIN FW Combo 7.5 W: WW Wilson/Cowan · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Monica French
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-10-09 · NIN FW Combo 7.5 W: WW Wilson/Cowan · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Angie Hansen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-09-25 · NIN FW Combo 7.5 W: WW Wilson/Cowan · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pollyanna Martin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-09-19 · NIN MXD 40&O 8.0: Barger · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with George Martin mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-23 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Grabill · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Grabill championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-23 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Grabill · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Grabill championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-22 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Grabill · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Kimball championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-21 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Grabill · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Grabill championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-08 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Grabill · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Grabill championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-02 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Grabill · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Grabill championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chloe Smithley championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
93.3%
14W–1L · 62.1% of games
3.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 54.1% of games
4.0
74.3%
55W–19L · 62.5% of games
4.5
10%
1W–9L · 39.3% of games
7.5
78.9%
30W–8L · 62% of games
8.5
50%
6W–6L · 53.6% of games
7.0mixed
81.2%
13W–3L · 62% of games
8.0mixed
58%
29W–21L · 54.7% of games
9.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 68.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
130 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
39 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams