← Search

Monica French

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Wayne, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
148 matches · 75W–73L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history148 matches
W
2026-10-17 · NIN FW Combo 7.5 W: WW Wilson/Cowan · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Megan Wilson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-19 · NIN FW Combo 7.5 W: WW Wilson/Cowan · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diane Cowan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-12 · NIN FW Combo 7.5 W: WW Wilson/Cowan · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nancy Lewis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-23 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Klinker/Wildrick · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Milissa Bohlender
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-15 · NIN FW 18&O 4.0 W: WW Cowan/Doden · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Wilson
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Klinker/Wildrick · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diana Reed
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-30 · NIN FW 18&O 4.0 W: WW Cowan/Doden · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Saraiva
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-25 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Klinker/Wildrick · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Lewis
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-24 · NIN FW 18&O 4.0 W: WW Cowan/Doden · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Clark
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-09 · NIN FW 18&O 4.0 W: WW Cowan/Doden · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-04 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Klinker/Wildrick · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Hutchins
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-23 · NIN FW 18&O Tri-Level 3.0,3.5,4.0 W: Heastan/Markley · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gail Rhoades
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
100%
4W–0L · 87.3% of games
4.0
47.1%
33W–37L · 48.7% of games
6.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 63.6% of games
7.5
70%
14W–6L · 56.9% of games
8.5
0%
0W–4L · 38.5% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 54.1% of games
8.0mixed
31.8%
7W–15L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
35 matches
#1 Singles
7%
10 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe