← Search

Melinda Romanetz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Niles, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 65W–35L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history100 matches
W
2026-11-01 · NIN SB Combo 8.5 W: SBRC Simeri · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sophia Pischalko
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-10-25 · NIN SB Combo 8.5 W: SBRC Simeri · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Diana Alkemade
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-10-21 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W Day: SBRC Gerber/Graham · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Dilorenzo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-30 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W Day: SBRC Gerber/Graham · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Dilorenzo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-08 · NIN SB 18&O 4.0 W: SBRC Widner/Kelly · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Lyon championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · NIN SB 40&O 4.0 W: SBRC Kelly/Devetski · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Lyon championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-01 · NIN SB 18&O 4.0 W: SBRC Widner/Kelly · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Christman championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-15 · NIN SB 40&O 4.0 W: SBRC Kelly/Devetski · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Lyon
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-09 · NIN SB 18&O 4.0 W: SBRC Widner/Kelly · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Minatel
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-25 · NIN SB 18&O 4.0 W: SBRC Widner/Kelly · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brita Miller
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · NIN SB 40&O 4.0 W: SBRC Kelly/Devetski · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Minatel
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-18 · NIN SB 18&O 4.0 W: SBRC Widner/Kelly · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brita Miller
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 50.6% of games
4.0
80.5%
33W–8L · 66.5% of games
4.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 49% of games
7.5
75%
6W–2L · 60% of games
8.0
50%
6W–6L · 49.6% of games
8.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 53.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova